vice-governor of nervous
" Roman Filimonov, commenting on statements by NGOs in relation to the authorities, advised community members and cultural workers to do "their case "- to teach children and make movies. "
Unfortunately, sometimes you can not normally ride / walk to work, to do his own job, because The Government of St. Petersburg NOT engaged in the business.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Extracapsular Cataract Extraction Instruments
awakening of reason?
Oh, cool: on the official site Ohta center began to consider alternative placements - before making decisions! We hope that reason will prevail, but some inner voice tells me that this is only a "teaser": (
But the description of new places ranging practically fit into the criteria that my colleagues and I suggested earlier . By these criteria, the options have different weights, but located abroad, the critical visual impact and no one has the advantage of a symbolic meaning (well, maybe the option "Utkin Backwater - bank of the Neva and the border of St. Petersburg).
funny that the list of criteria at the present site of the metro (very reasonable) and there is no "proximity to the center. " Obviously, without the latter can be avoided. What we said last three years.
Oh and nice, everyone is happy. This, of course, Leningrad region - there question about the place of registration and taxes, but as urban transport facilities, I think, quite possible for arrangements even exist. No, still very want to believe in the victory of reason over the entropy. Even when it comes to hotelok Gazprom.
Oh, cool: on the official site Ohta center began to consider alternative placements - before making decisions! We hope that reason will prevail, but some inner voice tells me that this is only a "teaser": (
But the description of new places ranging practically fit into the criteria that my colleagues and I suggested earlier . By these criteria, the options have different weights, but located abroad, the critical visual impact and no one has the advantage of a symbolic meaning (well, maybe the option "Utkin Backwater - bank of the Neva and the border of St. Petersburg).
funny that the list of criteria at the present site of the metro (very reasonable) and there is no "proximity to the center. " Obviously, without the latter can be avoided. What we said last three years.
Oh and nice, everyone is happy. This, of course, Leningrad region - there question about the place of registration and taxes, but as urban transport facilities, I think, quite possible for arrangements even exist. No, still very want to believe in the victory of reason over the entropy. Even when it comes to hotelok Gazprom.
Should I Get The Lepto Shot For My Dog?
lyrical
to care fractions \u0026lt;United Russia>> from courtroom Sachs before he took Mironov .
Thank you for the first time offered
real way to save the country:
Without every special effort
Coming at once and just leave.
We are on the tables of time, we note
Happy Hour lucky number,
When, for cabinets Mariinsky
We vermin passed.
today in a different way the sun shines,
Nadezhda crazy heart beats,
For happiness complete, please answer:
you are gone for good, I hope you return?
We applaud your innovation,
Think of the best hard to state order.
begins at the moment upgrading,
When the country is completely rid of you.
Author:![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=1)
tolkachev_a (bug fixes - is presented in LJ!:))
to care fractions \u0026lt;United Russia>> from courtroom Sachs before he took Mironov .
Thank you for the first time offered
real way to save the country:
Without every special effort
Coming at once and just leave.
We are on the tables of time, we note
Happy Hour lucky number,
When, for cabinets Mariinsky
We vermin passed.
today in a different way the sun shines,
Nadezhda crazy heart beats,
For happiness complete, please answer:
you are gone for good, I hope you return?
We applaud your innovation,
Think of the best hard to state order.
begins at the moment upgrading,
When the country is completely rid of you.
Author:
tolkachev_a (bug fixes - is presented in LJ!:)) Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Blood Donor Ft.lauderdale
and who need such a strategy?
Government of St. Petersburg (like once assembled) made a strategic decision: to replace planar multi-story parking garages and remove cars from the streets. OK, good job. District architects were asked to - to find the spot. " What the hell? There is a land market, the question of what to build and where - this is purely a market issue (subject to rules of construction). No, the executive decided to show their wisdom. Nakovyryali "spots" on New Year held public hearings in all areas by publishing information in the "Bulletin of the Russian Auction home "(!) that afternoon with fire you will not find, now are" for sale "as one lot by 462 (!) land plot with total area of 3,894,667 square meters. m. Bidding is scheduled for February 2 but the winner is already known, its officials call the real builders and offer different "versions".
And now that the city will receive as a result of "wise и заботливой" политики городской администрации (Земельные участки под паркинги - красным; их радиусы 500 метровой "видимости" (не факт, что это радиусы availability) - blue; pink Show areas of residential high-rise buildings, for which these car parks are needed.):
(Scheme prepared PN Nikonov)
From now query the MP Malkov:
"
Government of St. Petersburg (like once assembled) made a strategic decision: to replace planar multi-story parking garages and remove cars from the streets. OK, good job. District architects were asked to - to find the spot. " What the hell? There is a land market, the question of what to build and where - this is purely a market issue (subject to rules of construction). No, the executive decided to show their wisdom. Nakovyryali "spots" on New Year held public hearings in all areas by publishing information in the "Bulletin of the Russian Auction home "(!) that afternoon with fire you will not find, now are" for sale "as one lot by 462 (!) land plot with total area of 3,894,667 square meters. m. Bidding is scheduled for February 2 but the winner is already known, its officials call the real builders and offer different "versions".
And now that the city will receive as a result of "wise и заботливой" политики городской администрации (Земельные участки под паркинги - красным; их радиусы 500 метровой "видимости" (не факт, что это радиусы availability) - blue; pink Show areas of residential high-rise buildings, for which these car parks are needed.):
| City as a whole | south-western district |
 |  |
| Southwest partially | eastern areas |
 |  |
(Scheme prepared PN Nikonov)
From now query the MP Malkov:
"
schemes demonstrate that much of the existing residential development is not will be provided with parking lots located within walking distance . This means that the proposed address program will not solve those problems for which it was planned: the owners of vehicles will not acquire space in the parking garage, and will continue to keep cars on the streets and vnutridvorovye territories.
more detailed analysis shows that many of the land included in Annex 1 to the Resolution, unsuitable for storage transport residents of St. Petersburg . A significant portion of sites located deep in the industrial zones, including in areas cut off from residential areas railways, water obstacles. Parking will be posted here, at best, be used by employees of enterprises for temporary storage of motor vehicles during the workday. Part of the sites is located among the territories of individual residential buildings, where cars are usually stored on your own land. Part of the sites formed in the open field, where the relevance of such structures is generally absent.
On the other hand, problem of parking in central areas it has not solved . For example, in the Petrograd district of St. Petersburg for the construction of such facilities offered only one plot of land at: South Road, section 1, (west of house 15, letter A the road south), inventory number 78:7:3284:17. This plot is located in the western part of Krestovsky Island (directly at the stadium under construction) at 2 km from the residential areas. Herewith: Firstly, on Krestovsky virtually no residential buildings in need of such a garage construction, as provided by its own built-in гаражами, а во-вторых, сам стадион должен быть обеспечен парковочными местами в соответствии с нормативами.
Вызывает сомнение и целесообразность placement of parking lots in areas promising housing estates, as modern standards of housing organizations require garages as directly embedded and attached premises.
Total doubts and questions of accommodation of about 120 plots of 462 .
On the other hand, the placement of sites across the city with respect to residential areas characterized by significant non-uniformity. In one case the land site is a single spot on which it is possible to place a garage only a symbolic capacity, and in another - the concentration of land plots as a significant area, which casts doubt on the possibility to build up such a site just one, albeit a very large garage complex. In addition, in one case, the availability to only a small part of the future garage has only a part of the residential quarter, and the number of pledged their cars will not cover the needs of even the inhabitants of this part. In another - the territory is surrounded by a quarter of the entire bulk such sites, multiple overlapping bands of their availability, which means multiple excess of supply over demand for parking spaces.
Analyzing scheme, it is impossible not to see chaos and lack of system to make decisions and at the same time and the lack of its effectiveness and validity. Many of the garages, constructed in these areas, will remain unused, while others, by contrast, will not be able to meet the needs. It appears that this result is a consequence of work without a proper regulatory framework and without adequate public discussion of the project address program as a whole. Appear working on compiling a list of these sites there was no component of urban planning. In many cases more successful for accommodation objects such land for today and in the absence of necessary urban planning have been built up with other objects. However, savings in urban planning threatens to turn into significant spending on real estate development, which would be unnecessary, and the loss of возможности эффективно использовать и развивать территорию города."
Далее следует несколько вопросов губернатору. У меня же есть только один вопрос: anyone still believes that the executive is able to take smart decisions? If yes, please, where you pick the one elixir of optimism that fuels your beliefs. Go, Zatar before the next era of deficit.
PS frendz, distribute, and then the guys, as usual, do not know ...
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
My Hp V40 Won't Print Color
Letter to the Governor of the Nevsky 68
as soon as possible - Please!
vote in support of the decision - here: http://democrator.ru/problem/3815 and ask their friends to support the issue. The census is welcome!
NB - Text not a "pleading" , there is demand the resignation of Horta, etc. - See the link, and, just in case - below.
as soon as possible - Please!
vote in support of the decision - here: http://democrator.ru/problem/3815 and ask their friends to support the issue. The census is welcome!
NB - Text not a "pleading" , there is demand the resignation of Horta, etc. - See the link, and, just in case - below.
Dear Valentina!
Attention Concerned St. Petersburg today drawn to the situation surrounding the demolition of the so-called "Literary Houses" (house number 68) on the corner of Nevsky Prospekt and the Fontanka River. Gradozaschitnyh representatives of organizations at the end of last year, personally addressed to you to intervene to prevent the complete destruction of the sixth since 2003, the historic home on Nevsky Prospekt. But the management of the building block of your administration meeting in Smolny 17 December 2010 did not heed our calls to suspend the approval of the draft apartment-hotel, prepared by OOO AvtoKomBalt. So way has been lost the opportunity to quietly, without scandal to consider options for preserving historical buildings and optimization of the developed project. December 30 Service of Construction Supervision and Examination issued the developer a building permit, and the weekend began a rapid drift building.
next demolition once again showed all the evils carried out in urban planning practice: 1) service building inspection and examination and other competent authorities have no control over the observance of the Law of St. Petersburg № 820-7 «On the limits and modes of protection zones ..." and the Law of St. Petersburg № 29-10 «On rules землепользования и застройки»; 2) Управление государственной экспертизы полагается на полученные застройщиком согласования, но не проверяет устранение claims made by other agencies during the design changes, and 3) the public authorities of St. Petersburg did not inform the residents of such projects and demonstrate its inability to explain to citizens the base of the decisions, provoking a conflict. We note that the Government St. Petersburg failed to establish a system of responsible decision-making on building, operating in the "single window".
In this situation, when public authorities virtually eliminated from the resolution of the festering another scandal, gradozaschitnye organizations were forced to go for direct negotiations with the developer. Job bilateral group of experts confirmed that the technical ability to save at least part of a genuine historic building was not lost even after the disassembly. Especially since it existed at the time of project approval and issuance of the act of building an expert Commission of the Housing Committee of St. Petersburg Government. Thus, the decisions of public authorities to justify the demolition of the building, were taken in direct conflict with the existing legislation, including - regime security zone.
the example of building on Nevsky 68, we observe testing of the fraudulent scheme, in which the owner shall bring the historic building before the accident negligent maintenance or other, often deliberately, actions, then gets the conclusion of the expert committee on the construction uneconomical removing buildings from the state of emergency and runs the project "Reconstruction with drift", which will then be confirmed by the construction expertise. In this often turns out that the technical survey of damaged buildings is carried out on a commercial basis by the same people who then prepare and sign an opinion of the expert commission building. This scheme can be carried any building in the buffer zone of the historic center of St. Petersburg.
Realizing that the improvement of legislation for Elimination of new fraud schemes always takes time, we insist on making immediate effective measures to address systemic causes of the destruction historical appearance of St. Petersburg:
1) Dissolve the expert commission for the construction of the Housing Committee of St. Petersburg Government (Chairman Greenberg VE) due to the fact that the commission in its present composition is responsible for the systematic issuing unwarranted conclusions about the need сноса зданий, а необходимость такой комиссии не предусмотрена действующим законодательством.
2) dismissed the head of the Service Construction Supervision and Examination of AI-Horta, who is your immediate subordinates, the inability to send the Service for execution law in St. Petersburg.
3) As soon as possible to bridge the gaps in the regulation of building inspection services and expertise, putting on her full responsibility for conformity assessment of project documentation requirements of the legislation in the field of urban planning and protection of cultural heritage objects, including - evaluation conclusions on unsafe buildings.
4) To support the proposals of representatives of public management organizations LLC Avtokombalt "Change of architectural solutions reconstituted building facades at Nevsky, 68 (existing) to conservation of Nevsky Prospekt and Embankment. p. Fontanka composition of completed urban open space.
5) Run for the budget by project conservation that part of the building at Nevsky 68, which can still be saved.
We hope that you have taken emergency measures will stop the wave of demolitions of historic зданий, вновь возникшую после того, как недобросовестные застройщики нашли лазейки для проталкивания пагубных для Города проектов в обход действующего legislation.
Alexander Sokurov film director, Honoured Artist of Russia, a member of the Council for Culture and Arts under the President
Kononov Alexander deputy chairman of the St. Petersburg branch VOOPIK
Karpov, Alexander S. Director of the Center Appraisal ECOM
Maxim Reznik, the chairman of L. Saint-Petersburg branch of Yabloko
Minutina Julia L. coordinator of the movement The Living City »
Kozlov Evgeniy Coordinator of the Movement for Civic Initiatives
Attention Concerned St. Petersburg today drawn to the situation surrounding the demolition of the so-called "Literary Houses" (house number 68) on the corner of Nevsky Prospekt and the Fontanka River. Gradozaschitnyh representatives of organizations at the end of last year, personally addressed to you to intervene to prevent the complete destruction of the sixth since 2003, the historic home on Nevsky Prospekt. But the management of the building block of your administration meeting in Smolny 17 December 2010 did not heed our calls to suspend the approval of the draft apartment-hotel, prepared by OOO AvtoKomBalt. So way has been lost the opportunity to quietly, without scandal to consider options for preserving historical buildings and optimization of the developed project. December 30 Service of Construction Supervision and Examination issued the developer a building permit, and the weekend began a rapid drift building.
next demolition once again showed all the evils carried out in urban planning practice: 1) service building inspection and examination and other competent authorities have no control over the observance of the Law of St. Petersburg № 820-7 «On the limits and modes of protection zones ..." and the Law of St. Petersburg № 29-10 «On rules землепользования и застройки»; 2) Управление государственной экспертизы полагается на полученные застройщиком согласования, но не проверяет устранение claims made by other agencies during the design changes, and 3) the public authorities of St. Petersburg did not inform the residents of such projects and demonstrate its inability to explain to citizens the base of the decisions, provoking a conflict. We note that the Government St. Petersburg failed to establish a system of responsible decision-making on building, operating in the "single window".
In this situation, when public authorities virtually eliminated from the resolution of the festering another scandal, gradozaschitnye organizations were forced to go for direct negotiations with the developer. Job bilateral group of experts confirmed that the technical ability to save at least part of a genuine historic building was not lost even after the disassembly. Especially since it existed at the time of project approval and issuance of the act of building an expert Commission of the Housing Committee of St. Petersburg Government. Thus, the decisions of public authorities to justify the demolition of the building, were taken in direct conflict with the existing legislation, including - regime security zone.
the example of building on Nevsky 68, we observe testing of the fraudulent scheme, in which the owner shall bring the historic building before the accident negligent maintenance or other, often deliberately, actions, then gets the conclusion of the expert committee on the construction uneconomical removing buildings from the state of emergency and runs the project "Reconstruction with drift", which will then be confirmed by the construction expertise. In this often turns out that the technical survey of damaged buildings is carried out on a commercial basis by the same people who then prepare and sign an opinion of the expert commission building. This scheme can be carried any building in the buffer zone of the historic center of St. Petersburg.
Realizing that the improvement of legislation for Elimination of new fraud schemes always takes time, we insist on making immediate effective measures to address systemic causes of the destruction historical appearance of St. Petersburg:
1) Dissolve the expert commission for the construction of the Housing Committee of St. Petersburg Government (Chairman Greenberg VE) due to the fact that the commission in its present composition is responsible for the systematic issuing unwarranted conclusions about the need сноса зданий, а необходимость такой комиссии не предусмотрена действующим законодательством.
2) dismissed the head of the Service Construction Supervision and Examination of AI-Horta, who is your immediate subordinates, the inability to send the Service for execution law in St. Petersburg.
3) As soon as possible to bridge the gaps in the regulation of building inspection services and expertise, putting on her full responsibility for conformity assessment of project documentation requirements of the legislation in the field of urban planning and protection of cultural heritage objects, including - evaluation conclusions on unsafe buildings.
4) To support the proposals of representatives of public management organizations LLC Avtokombalt "Change of architectural solutions reconstituted building facades at Nevsky, 68 (existing) to conservation of Nevsky Prospekt and Embankment. p. Fontanka composition of completed urban open space.
5) Run for the budget by project conservation that part of the building at Nevsky 68, which can still be saved.
We hope that you have taken emergency measures will stop the wave of demolitions of historic зданий, вновь возникшую после того, как недобросовестные застройщики нашли лазейки для проталкивания пагубных для Города проектов в обход действующего legislation.
Alexander Sokurov film director, Honoured Artist of Russia, a member of the Council for Culture and Arts under the President
Kononov Alexander deputy chairman of the St. Petersburg branch VOOPIK
Karpov, Alexander S. Director of the Center Appraisal ECOM
Maxim Reznik, the chairman of L. Saint-Petersburg branch of Yabloko
Minutina Julia L. coordinator of the movement The Living City »
Kozlov Evgeniy Coordinator of the Movement for Civic Initiatives
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Pokemon Mystery Dungeon Für Mac
City Court's decision which was overturned, "Ohta-Center"
Since none of the applicants have not bothered published a landmark decision of the City Court of 20.12.2010, it is necessary to do this in the blog of the Center ECOM (despite the fact that we do not engage in this business).
analysis of solutions shows что отменено всё высотное регулирование "через ПЗЗ" во всех зонах охраны объектов культурного наследия (ЗРЗ-1, ЗРЗ-2, ... ЗРЗ-6, ЗОЛ), и это касается как "Local landmarks, and the parameters of the background height in cases where it differs from the agreed Rosokhrankultura.
In addition to solving There are many other interesting aspects, including - direct indication of forgery officials Smolny. Which explains, in some way, persistence Minister Avdeev and its subordinate departments in bringing the story to its logical conclusion. Still, even in Russia every day regional officials forge documents already signed by the federal agency.
decision has not yet entered into force, it has challenged the city in the sun, but ... short, read for yourself.
Since none of the applicants have not bothered published a landmark decision of the City Court of 20.12.2010, it is necessary to do this in the blog of the Center ECOM (despite the fact that we do not engage in this business).
analysis of solutions shows что отменено всё высотное регулирование "через ПЗЗ" во всех зонах охраны объектов культурного наследия (ЗРЗ-1, ЗРЗ-2, ... ЗРЗ-6, ЗОЛ), и это касается как "Local landmarks, and the parameters of the background height in cases where it differs from the agreed Rosokhrankultura.
In addition to solving There are many other interesting aspects, including - direct indication of forgery officials Smolny. Which explains, in some way, persistence Minister Avdeev and its subordinate departments in bringing the story to its logical conclusion. Still, even in Russia every day regional officials forge documents already signed by the federal agency.
decision has not yet entered into force, it has challenged the city in the sun, but ... short, read for yourself.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Littlest Pet Shop Pool Party Invitations
Bloggers atheist Putin said the Constitution and Sobyanin
Originally posted by![[info]](http://files.livejournal.com/userhead/28)
teh_nomad at atheist bloggers have reminded Putin and Sobyanin Constitution
I respect people who can not wait for them to allow the state to declare its position.
Originally posted by
I respect people who can not wait for them to allow the state to declare its position.
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Wrong Disc Inserted Please Insert The Original
would be better, but did not know how to say words (RNGP-3)
" minimum service radius set for the following facilities services to the public:
- preschool education - 300 m ... "
Who do I interpret this phrase? Do not take it to kindergarten children from homes closest 300 meters, or those on 300 meters? from which, incidentally, Meters believe? If the kindergarten is full or not full, then what?
And you want to узнать, что такое "минимальный радиус обслуживания" из самого текста закона? Пожалуйста:
" радиус обслуживания – радиус условной окружности, whose center is the location of the object's public services, limiting the territory within which provides convenient pedestrian svyazi prozhivaniya by local populations to local obsluzhivaemogo razmeshteniya obaekta serviced populations and body movements gorodskogo passazhirskogo Transport on the road network, "- all clear?
That is, we spend a circle - in school, damn it, have been taught - and we rejoice: now you care. And if this circle crosses the river there is any fine, or train, or just a street with heavy traffic - your problems, dear children from their parents. Learn to flit like birds.
PS needed addition to the pics: "I'm not tolerant of idiots in government service"
" minimum service radius set for the following facilities services to the public:
- preschool education - 300 m ... "
Who do I interpret this phrase? Do not take it to kindergarten children from homes closest 300 meters, or those on 300 meters? from which, incidentally, Meters believe? If the kindergarten is full or not full, then what?
And you want to узнать, что такое "минимальный радиус обслуживания" из самого текста закона? Пожалуйста:
" радиус обслуживания – радиус условной окружности, whose center is the location of the object's public services, limiting the territory within which provides convenient pedestrian svyazi prozhivaniya by local populations to local obsluzhivaemogo razmeshteniya obaekta serviced populations and body movements gorodskogo passazhirskogo Transport on the road network, "- all clear?
That is, we spend a circle - in school, damn it, have been taught - and we rejoice: now you care. And if this circle crosses the river there is any fine, or train, or just a street with heavy traffic - your problems, dear children from their parents. Learn to flit like birds.
PS needed addition to the pics: "I'm not tolerant of idiots in government service"
Friday, January 7, 2011
Satin Strands Havana Extensions
RNGP - continued jokes
"allowed the creation of pedestrian zones with an estimated density of pedestrian flows least 0,1 people / sq "
" Placement of gardens, parks, parkways should provide pedestrian accessibility residents of the municipality . "
" 50% of the vertical greenery "
" With the reconstruction of public and business buildings of the historic center of St. Petersburg should maintain and improve:
- basic qualities of a center zone of maximum concentration of objects (cultural, historical, administrative, research, design, training) with maximum preservation of residential development; "
and still should maintain and improve (Sic!) "dominant role and character of the zone of Nevsky Prospect as the chief of Focus city life and the main urban area." I simply can already see the future lawsuits against, for example, "Neva Hall:" the project undermines the dominant value of the zone of Nevsky Prospect ... "
"One of the main factors for the air quality of St. Petersburg is availability of green areas , which reduced не допускается ." - вот не допускается и всё тут. И ножкой топнуть.
"планировочные решения застройки должны учитывать условия аэрации прилегающей road network and intra-territory "
Look Dictionary: AERATION - 1. artificial saturation of various media to air oxidation they contain organic matter. It is used to purify drinking water and sewage. 2. Adjustable natural airflow in industrial buildings , which is carried out through apertures (windows) in walls and ventilation lights due to the difference of the densities inside and outside air. Used Ch. arr. in hot shops.
"In urban design (!) Provided ambient air quality in accordance environmental, sanitary-hygienic requirements.
Yes, you read that right, this quote from the draft law St. Petersburg, prepared authorized and competent Committee on City Planning and Architecture of St. Petersburg Administration .
"allowed the creation of pedestrian zones with an estimated density of pedestrian flows least 0,1 people / sq "
" Placement of gardens, parks, parkways should provide pedestrian accessibility residents of the municipality . "
" 50% of the vertical greenery "
" With the reconstruction of public and business buildings of the historic center of St. Petersburg should maintain and improve:
- basic qualities of a center zone of maximum concentration of objects (cultural, historical, administrative, research, design, training) with maximum preservation of residential development; "
and still should maintain and improve (Sic!) "dominant role and character of the zone of Nevsky Prospect as the chief of Focus city life and the main urban area." I simply can already see the future lawsuits against, for example, "Neva Hall:" the project undermines the dominant value of the zone of Nevsky Prospect ... "
"One of the main factors for the air quality of St. Petersburg is availability of green areas , which reduced не допускается ." - вот не допускается и всё тут. И ножкой топнуть.
"планировочные решения застройки должны учитывать условия аэрации прилегающей road network and intra-territory "
Look Dictionary: AERATION - 1. artificial saturation of various media to air oxidation they contain organic matter. It is used to purify drinking water and sewage. 2. Adjustable natural airflow in industrial buildings , which is carried out through apertures (windows) in walls and ventilation lights due to the difference of the densities inside and outside air. Used Ch. arr. in hot shops.
"In urban design (!) Provided ambient air quality in accordance environmental, sanitary-hygienic requirements.
Yes, you read that right, this quote from the draft law St. Petersburg, prepared authorized and competent Committee on City Planning and Architecture of St. Petersburg Administration .
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
1994 Ford Aspire Thermostat Location
change the rules of my blog?
... once established that the "decline vocabulary is not welcome. " In short, that cursing and swear words are not stupid. This discipline. But I have to say, reading the bill, prepared by the Government of St. Petersburg, so that's the phrase: "The formation of land by the territory common use for construction and operation of underground facilities ..."?! Damn, they are that, for dwarfs the laws they write?!
... I was assured that this bill has passed the full cycle of approvals in all the committees of the Government ... Lord, give me strength to be polite and write an informed opinion on this article ...
UPD : aa-aa-ah! Here's another: "accessibility ( of urban environment ) - the possibility of the population (!), Including those with limited populations (including disabled), move freely the territory of St Petersburg, including within the social infrastructure and places of service. "
The population of St. Petersburg! Remember - all depends on your abilities! Learn to walk through walls, fly across the river and its tributaries, to seep through the sewers, and without disturbing the alarm pass through the closed industrial zones and neighborhoods - all Petersburg will be available to you.
... once established that the "decline vocabulary is not welcome. " In short, that cursing and swear words are not stupid. This discipline. But I have to say, reading the bill, prepared by the Government of St. Petersburg, so that's the phrase: "The formation of land by the territory common use for construction and operation of underground facilities ..."?! Damn, they are that, for dwarfs the laws they write?!
... I was assured that this bill has passed the full cycle of approvals in all the committees of the Government ... Lord, give me strength to be polite and write an informed opinion on this article ...
UPD : aa-aa-ah! Here's another: "accessibility ( of urban environment ) - the possibility of the population (!), Including those with limited populations (including disabled), move freely the territory of St Petersburg, including within the social infrastructure and places of service. "
The population of St. Petersburg! Remember - all depends on your abilities! Learn to walk through walls, fly across the river and its tributaries, to seep through the sewers, and without disturbing the alarm pass through the closed industrial zones and neighborhoods - all Petersburg will be available to you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)