as soon as possible - Please!
vote in support of the decision - here: http://democrator.ru/problem/3815 and ask their friends to support the issue. The census is welcome!
NB - Text not a "pleading" , there is demand the resignation of Horta, etc. - See the link, and, just in case - below.
Dear Valentina!
Attention Concerned St. Petersburg today drawn to the situation surrounding the demolition of the so-called "Literary Houses" (house number 68) on the corner of Nevsky Prospekt and the Fontanka River. Gradozaschitnyh representatives of organizations at the end of last year, personally addressed to you to intervene to prevent the complete destruction of the sixth since 2003, the historic home on Nevsky Prospekt. But the management of the building block of your administration meeting in Smolny 17 December 2010 did not heed our calls to suspend the approval of the draft apartment-hotel, prepared by OOO AvtoKomBalt. So way has been lost the opportunity to quietly, without scandal to consider options for preserving historical buildings and optimization of the developed project. December 30 Service of Construction Supervision and Examination issued the developer a building permit, and the weekend began a rapid drift building.
next demolition once again showed all the evils carried out in urban planning practice: 1) service building inspection and examination and other competent authorities have no control over the observance of the Law of St. Petersburg № 820-7 «On the limits and modes of protection zones ..." and the Law of St. Petersburg № 29-10 «On rules землепользования и застройки»; 2) Управление государственной экспертизы полагается на полученные застройщиком согласования, но не проверяет устранение claims made by other agencies during the design changes, and 3) the public authorities of St. Petersburg did not inform the residents of such projects and demonstrate its inability to explain to citizens the base of the decisions, provoking a conflict. We note that the Government St. Petersburg failed to establish a system of responsible decision-making on building, operating in the "single window".
In this situation, when public authorities virtually eliminated from the resolution of the festering another scandal, gradozaschitnye organizations were forced to go for direct negotiations with the developer. Job bilateral group of experts confirmed that the technical ability to save at least part of a genuine historic building was not lost even after the disassembly. Especially since it existed at the time of project approval and issuance of the act of building an expert Commission of the Housing Committee of St. Petersburg Government. Thus, the decisions of public authorities to justify the demolition of the building, were taken in direct conflict with the existing legislation, including - regime security zone.
the example of building on Nevsky 68, we observe testing of the fraudulent scheme, in which the owner shall bring the historic building before the accident negligent maintenance or other, often deliberately, actions, then gets the conclusion of the expert committee on the construction uneconomical removing buildings from the state of emergency and runs the project "Reconstruction with drift", which will then be confirmed by the construction expertise. In this often turns out that the technical survey of damaged buildings is carried out on a commercial basis by the same people who then prepare and sign an opinion of the expert commission building. This scheme can be carried any building in the buffer zone of the historic center of St. Petersburg.
Realizing that the improvement of legislation for Elimination of new fraud schemes always takes time, we insist on making immediate effective measures to address systemic causes of the destruction historical appearance of St. Petersburg:
1) Dissolve the expert commission for the construction of the Housing Committee of St. Petersburg Government (Chairman Greenberg VE) due to the fact that the commission in its present composition is responsible for the systematic issuing unwarranted conclusions about the need сноса зданий, а необходимость такой комиссии не предусмотрена действующим законодательством.
2) dismissed the head of the Service Construction Supervision and Examination of AI-Horta, who is your immediate subordinates, the inability to send the Service for execution law in St. Petersburg.
3) As soon as possible to bridge the gaps in the regulation of building inspection services and expertise, putting on her full responsibility for conformity assessment of project documentation requirements of the legislation in the field of urban planning and protection of cultural heritage objects, including - evaluation conclusions on unsafe buildings.
4) To support the proposals of representatives of public management organizations LLC Avtokombalt "Change of architectural solutions reconstituted building facades at Nevsky, 68 (existing) to conservation of Nevsky Prospekt and Embankment. p. Fontanka composition of completed urban open space.
5) Run for the budget by project conservation that part of the building at Nevsky 68, which can still be saved.
We hope that you have taken emergency measures will stop the wave of demolitions of historic зданий, вновь возникшую после того, как недобросовестные застройщики нашли лазейки для проталкивания пагубных для Города проектов в обход действующего legislation.
Alexander Sokurov film director, Honoured Artist of Russia, a member of the Council for Culture and Arts under the President
Kononov Alexander deputy chairman of the St. Petersburg branch VOOPIK
Karpov, Alexander S. Director of the Center Appraisal ECOM
Maxim Reznik, the chairman of L. Saint-Petersburg branch of Yabloko
Minutina Julia L. coordinator of the movement The Living City »
Kozlov Evgeniy Coordinator of the Movement for Civic Initiatives
Attention Concerned St. Petersburg today drawn to the situation surrounding the demolition of the so-called "Literary Houses" (house number 68) on the corner of Nevsky Prospekt and the Fontanka River. Gradozaschitnyh representatives of organizations at the end of last year, personally addressed to you to intervene to prevent the complete destruction of the sixth since 2003, the historic home on Nevsky Prospekt. But the management of the building block of your administration meeting in Smolny 17 December 2010 did not heed our calls to suspend the approval of the draft apartment-hotel, prepared by OOO AvtoKomBalt. So way has been lost the opportunity to quietly, without scandal to consider options for preserving historical buildings and optimization of the developed project. December 30 Service of Construction Supervision and Examination issued the developer a building permit, and the weekend began a rapid drift building.
next demolition once again showed all the evils carried out in urban planning practice: 1) service building inspection and examination and other competent authorities have no control over the observance of the Law of St. Petersburg № 820-7 «On the limits and modes of protection zones ..." and the Law of St. Petersburg № 29-10 «On rules землепользования и застройки»; 2) Управление государственной экспертизы полагается на полученные застройщиком согласования, но не проверяет устранение claims made by other agencies during the design changes, and 3) the public authorities of St. Petersburg did not inform the residents of such projects and demonstrate its inability to explain to citizens the base of the decisions, provoking a conflict. We note that the Government St. Petersburg failed to establish a system of responsible decision-making on building, operating in the "single window".
In this situation, when public authorities virtually eliminated from the resolution of the festering another scandal, gradozaschitnye organizations were forced to go for direct negotiations with the developer. Job bilateral group of experts confirmed that the technical ability to save at least part of a genuine historic building was not lost even after the disassembly. Especially since it existed at the time of project approval and issuance of the act of building an expert Commission of the Housing Committee of St. Petersburg Government. Thus, the decisions of public authorities to justify the demolition of the building, were taken in direct conflict with the existing legislation, including - regime security zone.
the example of building on Nevsky 68, we observe testing of the fraudulent scheme, in which the owner shall bring the historic building before the accident negligent maintenance or other, often deliberately, actions, then gets the conclusion of the expert committee on the construction uneconomical removing buildings from the state of emergency and runs the project "Reconstruction with drift", which will then be confirmed by the construction expertise. In this often turns out that the technical survey of damaged buildings is carried out on a commercial basis by the same people who then prepare and sign an opinion of the expert commission building. This scheme can be carried any building in the buffer zone of the historic center of St. Petersburg.
Realizing that the improvement of legislation for Elimination of new fraud schemes always takes time, we insist on making immediate effective measures to address systemic causes of the destruction historical appearance of St. Petersburg:
1) Dissolve the expert commission for the construction of the Housing Committee of St. Petersburg Government (Chairman Greenberg VE) due to the fact that the commission in its present composition is responsible for the systematic issuing unwarranted conclusions about the need сноса зданий, а необходимость такой комиссии не предусмотрена действующим законодательством.
2) dismissed the head of the Service Construction Supervision and Examination of AI-Horta, who is your immediate subordinates, the inability to send the Service for execution law in St. Petersburg.
3) As soon as possible to bridge the gaps in the regulation of building inspection services and expertise, putting on her full responsibility for conformity assessment of project documentation requirements of the legislation in the field of urban planning and protection of cultural heritage objects, including - evaluation conclusions on unsafe buildings.
4) To support the proposals of representatives of public management organizations LLC Avtokombalt "Change of architectural solutions reconstituted building facades at Nevsky, 68 (existing) to conservation of Nevsky Prospekt and Embankment. p. Fontanka composition of completed urban open space.
5) Run for the budget by project conservation that part of the building at Nevsky 68, which can still be saved.
We hope that you have taken emergency measures will stop the wave of demolitions of historic зданий, вновь возникшую после того, как недобросовестные застройщики нашли лазейки для проталкивания пагубных для Города проектов в обход действующего legislation.
Alexander Sokurov film director, Honoured Artist of Russia, a member of the Council for Culture and Arts under the President
Kononov Alexander deputy chairman of the St. Petersburg branch VOOPIK
Karpov, Alexander S. Director of the Center Appraisal ECOM
Maxim Reznik, the chairman of L. Saint-Petersburg branch of Yabloko
Minutina Julia L. coordinator of the movement The Living City »
Kozlov Evgeniy Coordinator of the Movement for Civic Initiatives
0 comments:
Post a Comment